Dear
Veterans,
Giving
case to AG by MOD was expected. Whatever may be the assertions of MOD but the
reason there of is that the AG is part of Govt and no wonder he may well
support MOD because of the MoD’s interpretations, inferences and similarities
drawn out of the HHC Kerala and HSC judgments.
My
analysis and reservations are given below:-
1. As per the judicial pronouncements and
judgments Rank Pay which was introduced exclusively for AF Officers from Capt
to Brig wef 01 Jan 86 in IV CPC was in addition to Basic Pay and it forms part
of basic pay which means it earns all those allowance basic pay earns. My
assertion here is that it is grossly incorrect of adding rank pay to basic pay
for comparison of AF Officers pay with their civilian counter parts.
2. The Judgment says the deduction of rank
pay from total emoluments while fixation of pay was incorrect, irregular and
illegal.
3. The Judgments were delivered in the case
of Maj Dhanapalan who was Capt on 01 Jan 1986 and whose rank pay was deducted
from the total emoluments while fixation of the pay. Maj Dhanapalan retired in
the IV CPC era only and he was not effected fixation of pay in V CPC on 01 Jan
1996.
4. The
HSC in its judgment in the case of Maj Dhanapalan, clarified that its order
shall govern all similarly situated officers who have not approached the court and also
those who have filed
Writ Petitions which
are pending before
various High Courts/Armed Forces Tribunal.
What MoD has interpreted
and drawn inferences and similarities from the phrase similarly situated officers
by co-relating to Maj Dhanapalan were officers who were in the ranks of Capt to
Brig on 01 Jan 1986 as that of Maj Dhanapalan this is the first similarity
that MOD has drawn from the judgment. Since Maj Dhanapalan was retired in IV
CPC era only and his case was not involved in deduction of rank pay on 01 Jan
1996, the MoD has drawn second similarity of Maj Dhanapalan case and closed
Rank Pay case on 31 Dec 1995. Now see how cleverly and smartly the MOD babus
have drawn the similarities and inference from the judgments. They remained
silent as far as deduction of rank pay in Vth CPC and couple of other
irregularities they committed in fixation of pay in Vth CPC on 01 Jan 1996.
They drawn similarities in correlation to Maj Dhanapalan only and left with all
other irregularities they committed in fixation of pay in Vth CPC. I am giving
below certain tables as to how CDA (O) has fixed pay on 01 Jan 1996 and self
calculation of pay as on that date.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If we carefully
study the pay fixation by CDA(O) in table 1 above, they have given all that
allowances on rank pay but clubbed together with basic pay which was grossly
incorrect and irregular. Out of the total emoluments they deducted only 400
towards revised rank pay (though the total rank pay was Rs 601) and rest amount
including unrevised rank pay fixed as basic pay to show was that a captain with
13 years service and with 13 increments is at par with his civilian counter
part. Does not it mean the civilian counter part has got the benefit of
unrevised rank pay meant for AF Officers only? Isn’t it an eye opener for all
of us as to how babus have cheated us? Our rank pay of IV CPC multiplies by
three times and not just doubles as given to us in Vth CPC.
In IV CPC pay
fixation case the babus have done one mistake of deducting rank pay but in pay
fixation in Vth CPC they made three mistakes thinking that AF officers will
never raise any doubts/cases.
May I request
RDOA, the remedy now is only filing contempt case bringing out as to how babus
have drawn the similarities from the judgments and closed rank pay arrears at
31 Dec 95 in IVth CPC era only though the same mistake of irregular deduction
of rank pay coupled with more irregularities were committed once again by babus
in Vth CPC.
Since AG is part
of Govt who is respondent in this case, we as the petitioners need not wait for
AG’s remarks.